home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ The Supreme Court / The Supreme Court.iso / pc / briefs / 1992 / 92_1223 / 1223p022.tif (.png) < prev    next >
Tagged Image File Format  |  1995-08-30  |  85KB  |  1696x2200
Labels: book | jotter | reckoner | sky | tree | windowpane
OCR: collective bargaining considerations in the balance under Exemption Pet. App 30a-34a Judge Garza also found no merit the suggestion that Reporters Commitiee may be distinguished becausc Exemption differs ir some respects from Exempt tion 7(C) He explained that "[t]he difference between Exempti fon {s] and 7(C} goes t.r the degree of personal privacy needed outweigh the public interest, while "the public interest factor remains the same under hoth exemptions Pet. App 30a. Judge Garza concluded that disclosure employees' home addresses nut warranted becar usc release would not disclose anything about what the ment is would impinge on emplovees right t privacy. at 27a. 34a SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT It is undisputed that the release of employees' home addresses is harred by the Privacy Act uniess di ...